<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nuclear Power or Wind Energy? That is The Question</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theenergyladyuk.com/blog/alternative-energy/wind-versus-nuclear-no-contest/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theenergyladyuk.com/blog/alternative-energy/wind-versus-nuclear-no-contest/</link>
	<description>Save Energy Now. Tomorrow May Be Too Late.  Think Global,  Act Local</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 14:55:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tomgraywind</title>
		<link>http://theenergyladyuk.com/blog/alternative-energy/wind-versus-nuclear-no-contest/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>tomgraywind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 23:26:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theenergyladyuk.com/blog/alternative-energy/wind-versus-nuclear-no-contest/#comment-7</guid>
		<description>Hi Anne,

I believe the report on wind&#039;s supposed unreliability was overblown, if you will pardon a poor pun.  Most utility power systems rely on a mix of resources to ensure reliability.  The coal plant you mention may have been fired up to bail out the nuclear plant, but presumably it ran for only a short period of time and emitted a modest amount of greenhouse gases.  The same is true for wind power.  It matches up well with gas-fired power.  A system in the UK, which has a generally excellent wind resource,  should use relatively little fuel and produce low emissions with a mix of wind and gas.

Regards,
Thomas O. Gray
American Wind Energy Association
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.powerofwind.org&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.powerofwind.org&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.awea.org&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.awea.org&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Anne,</p>
<p>I believe the report on wind&#8217;s supposed unreliability was overblown, if you will pardon a poor pun.  Most utility power systems rely on a mix of resources to ensure reliability.  The coal plant you mention may have been fired up to bail out the nuclear plant, but presumably it ran for only a short period of time and emitted a modest amount of greenhouse gases.  The same is true for wind power.  It matches up well with gas-fired power.  A system in the UK, which has a generally excellent wind resource,  should use relatively little fuel and produce low emissions with a mix of wind and gas.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Thomas O. Gray<br />
American Wind Energy Association<br />
<a href="http://www.powerofwind.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.powerofwind.org</a><br />
<a href="http://www.awea.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.awea.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

